High Court investigation confirms claims of sexual harassment by former justice

“We're ashamed that this could have happened at the High Court of Australia. We have made a sincere apology to the six women whose complaints were borne out. We know it would have been difficult to come forward. Their accounts of their experiences at the time have been believed,” she said.

Kiefel added that the women she spoke to shared insights on their experiences and suggested changes to the court. She highlighted six recommendations that have been adopted and acted upon:

• The court should develop a supplementary HR policy relevant to the particular employment circumstances of the personal staff of justices, including associates
• The court should review the induction it provides to associates to make sure it covers material directly relevant to their specialised role
• The court should identify an appropriate person to form a closer working relationship with associates. This person would check in regularly with associates, fulfil some of the administrative advisory function of a supervisor, provide support if required, and act as a conduit to the chief executive and principal registrar where appropriate
• The court should clarify that the confidentiality requirements for associates relate only to the work of the court
• The court should make clear to associates that their duties do not extend to an obligation to attend social functions
• The court should consider canvassing current associates to find out more about their experiences while working at the court

“We have moved to do all we can to make sure the experiences of these women will not be repeated. There is no place for sexual harassment in any workplace,” Kiefel said. “We have strengthened our policies and training to make clear the importance of a respectful workplace at the court and we have made sure there is both support and confidential avenues for complaint if anything like this were to happen again.”

Law Council of Australia President Pauline Wright applauded the court’s action on the matter, particularly its commitment to acting on the recommendations.

“The Law Council believes that all employers have a duty to eliminate sex discrimination, sexual harassment and victimisation in the workplace. It is pleasing that the High Court dealt with the allegations of sexual harassment in a timely and appropriate manner, by commissioning an independent inquiry,” she said. “There is no excuse for the behaviour the inquiry found to have been exhibited by the Hon Dyson Heydon, AC, QC in relation to the six female complainants.”

Women Lawyers Association ACT President Danielle Mildren said that “an industry-wide approach” is necessary in approaching the issue of sexual harassment in the profession, as many female lawyers in the ACT who have suffered the same treatment have kept silent due to “the power imbalance between the perpetrator and the complainant, as well as the very real fear of damaging their career prospects.”

The Law Society of NSW and the NSW Bar Association also issued statements of support in response to the High Court’s announcement.

“It is incumbent on all members of the legal profession to remain vigilant and take a position of leadership to work actively to eradicate sexual harassment, and all other forms of discrimination and bullying, from our workplaces and profession,” said NSW Bar Association president Tim Game.

“The Law Society of NSW is committed to ensuring that everyone in the profession is aware of the steps that can be taken if someone is subjected to harassment, bullying or inappropriate behaviour in the workplace,” Law Society of NSW President Richard Harvey said. “Everyone has the right to a safe place of work.”